76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Kumho Solus KH16 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus KH16 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro M/T | Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro M/T | Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 65 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 34
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro M/T | Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 51 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Solus KH16 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro M/T | Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro M/T | Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Solus KH16 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro M/T | Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro M/T | Kumho Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 69 |
| Dry | 82 | 76 |
| Wet | 75 | 67 |
| Snow | 85 | 51 |
| Comfort | 60 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 69 |
| Handling | 68 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Dynapro M/T is widely regarded as a high-value, durable mud-terrain tire that excels in longevity and off-road traction. While many users praise its impressive tread life and surprising on-road manners, some report significant performance degradation in wet conditions as the rubber compound ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall durability
- Strong off-road traction in mud and gravel
- Surprisingly low noise levels for a mud-terrain tire
- High value-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Potential for compound hardening over time
- Susceptibility to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
Observations
- Users operating heavy 4x4 vehicles report that the tires handle high-load conditions well, though some experience surface punctures when frequently driving on gravel.
- Owners of older, heavy SUVs (e.g., Ford Expedition) noted that aftermarket siping significantly improved performance in varied conditions.
The Kumho Solus KH16 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its quiet ride and reliable multi-surface grip, while others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather performance and sidewall stability. While some owners find the tire to be a cost-effective solution for daily driving, others express frustration with inconsistent tread life and handling characteristics.
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions for many users
- Strong value proposition and cost-per-mile efficiency
- Consistent performance across various vehicle types including MPVs and hatchbacks
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewall construction leading to poor handling feedback
- Significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and safety
- Inconsistent quality control experiences
Observations
- Users operating utility vehicles reported rapid tread wear, though this was contested by manufacturer representatives citing alignment issues.
- Owners of MPVs and hatchbacks generally reported higher satisfaction with the tire's comfort and daily driving performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro M/T | B · Kumho Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Hankook
69
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus KH16 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 85 vs 51 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Solus KH16 scores 80 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 83 vs 69 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 75 vs 67 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire B · Kumho Solus KH16
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Dynapro M/T also compared with
Kumho Solus KH16 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.