75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho V70a vs Yokohama Advan A10 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho V70a — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
V70a leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | V70a | Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 99 | 84 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
V70a leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | V70a | Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 66 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
V70a leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | V70a | Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 45 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | V70a | Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 55 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
V70a leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | V70a | Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho V70a | Yokohama Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 62 |
| Dry | 99 | 84 |
| Wet | 78 | 66 |
| Comfort | 70 | 45 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 55 |
| Handling | 86 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
62
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho V70a is highly regarded as a competitive, high-performance track tire that offers exceptional dry grip and surprising versatility in damp conditions. While users consistently praise its rapid warm-up time and stability, they note that its aggressive nature leads to rapid tread wear, making it better suited for dedicated track use than high-mileage street driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track performance
- Rapid warm-up time compared to competitors
- Strong stability and stiff sidewall construction
- Surprisingly capable in damp or light wet conditions
- High value-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Rapid tread wear rate
- Difficult to mount due to stiff sidewalls
- Limited longevity for daily driving
- Performance drops significantly in standing water
Observations
- Front-wheel drive users noted that tire temperature is critical for rear-end grip in wet conditions.
- High-performance vehicles like the M3 CSL and GT3 benefit from the tire's quick heat-cycling compared to standard track-day alternatives.
The Yokohama Advan A10 is generally regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry weather conditions but suffers from significant longevity and durability issues. While users frequently praise its impressive dry grip and responsiveness, the consensus is marred by reports of rapid tread wear, premature sidewall cracking, and excessive road noise at highway speeds.
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
- High level of responsiveness and handling precision
- Strong performance in warm, dry climates
Cons
- Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
- High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
- Frequent reports of premature sidewall cracking
Observations
- Mitsubishi Lancer owners frequently report premature sidewall cracking and uneven front-end tread wear.
- Users noted that the tire's firm, performance-oriented compound can lead to a harsh ride quality that negatively impacts comfort on longer journeys.
- AWD vehicle owners reported mixed results, with some finding the grip sufficient while others noted significant traction loss in damp conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho V70a | B · Yokohama Advan A10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Kumho
62
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Kumho V70a — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho V70a scores 70 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho V70a scores 86 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho V70a scores 99 vs 84 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho V70a scores 78 vs 66 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho V70a
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A10
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho V70a also compared with
Yokohama Advan A10 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.