75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental Eco Contact CP vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental Eco Contact CP — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eco Contact CP leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact CP | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eco Contact CP leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact CP | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact CP | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eco Contact CP leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact CP | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 69 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eco Contact CP leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact CP | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eco Contact CP leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Eco Contact CP | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact CP | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 65 |
| Dry | 90 | 75 |
| Wet | 70 | 55 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 73 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 64 |
| Handling | 70 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
65
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Eco Contact CP is generally regarded as a reliable, efficiency-focused tire that delivers commendable dry grip and acceleration performance. Users appreciate its low rolling resistance characteristics, though long-term durability and puncture resistance remain areas of mixed feedback.
Pros
- Strong dry weather traction and grip
- Responsive acceleration and handling
- Effective low rolling resistance for improved efficiency
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to road debris and punctures
- Mixed perceptions regarding long-term durability
- Limited feedback on wet weather performance
Observations
- Performance noted as consistent on compact vehicles like the Ford Focus
- Users report the tire functions well as an original equipment (OE) fitment
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact CP | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
65
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Continental Eco Contact CP — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Eco Contact CP scores 90 vs 75 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental Eco Contact CP scores 70 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental Eco Contact CP scores 77 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental Eco Contact CP scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental Eco Contact CP
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Eco Contact CP also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.