72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental PureContact LS vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental PureContact LS — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver A/S if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 52 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 48 | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 69 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 63 |
| Dry | 86 | 75 |
| Wet | 79 | 55 |
| Snow | 48 | 50 |
| Comfort | 58 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 64 |
| Handling | 85 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
63
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental PureContact LS receives a polarized reception from users, balancing praise for its longevity and wet-weather performance against significant complaints regarding noise levels and cold-weather flat-spotting. While some drivers appreciate the tire's luxury-oriented ride and tread life, others report inconsistent quality and frustrating vibration issues that detract from the overall ownership experience.
Pros
- Extended tread life compared to performance-oriented alternatives
- Reliable grip and stability in wet road conditions
- Comfortable, vibration-isolating ride quality
- Improved handling characteristics over many original equipment tires
Cons
- Persistent flat-spotting issues, particularly in colder temperatures
- Excessive road noise and humming at highway speeds
- Diminished traction and grip performance as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent winter weather capability
Observations
- Owners of luxury sedans like the Lexus ES 350 and Lincoln Continental reported significant issues with morning flat-spotting and vibrations.
- Users transitioning from performance-focused tires, such as the ExtremeContact DWS 06, noted a distinct trade-off between increased tread life and a loss of sporty steering feedback.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental
63
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver A/S if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PureContact LS scores 79 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental PureContact LS scores 85 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PureContact LS scores 86 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental PureContact LS also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.