Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin Defender LTX M/S

Premium Touring All Season tire

Michelin Defender LTX M/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
95/100
109 owner reviews
Dry
98
Wet
96
Snow
82
Comfort
96
Noise
95
Treadwear
97
Handling
97

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Premium Touring All Season tire

Michelin Energy Saver A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
55
Snow
50
Comfort
70
Noise
–
Treadwear
64
Handling
67

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender LTX M/S leads by 23
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
98
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
75
Why this score
SourceDefender LTX M/SEnergy Saver A/S
Tire Rack owners 92 82
Tyre Reviews owners 94 74

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender LTX M/S leads by 41
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
96
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
55
Why this score
SourceDefender LTX M/SEnergy Saver A/S
Tire Rack owners 83 73
Tyre Reviews owners 91 53

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender LTX M/S leads by 32
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
82
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
50
Why this score
SourceDefender LTX M/SEnergy Saver A/S
Tire Rack owners 94 52
Tyre Reviews owners 80 50

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender LTX M/S leads by 26
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
96
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
70
Why this score
SourceDefender LTX M/SEnergy Saver A/S
Tire Rack owners 84 81
Tyre Reviews owners 87 69

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
95
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender LTX M/S leads by 33
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
97
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
64
Why this score
SourceDefender LTX M/SEnergy Saver A/S
Tire Rack owners 92 76
Tyre Reviews owners 97 63

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender LTX M/S leads by 30
A — Michelin Defender LTX M/S
97
B — Michelin Energy Saver A/S
67
Why this score
SourceDefender LTX M/SEnergy Saver A/S
Tyre Reviews owners 85 67

Scores at a glance

Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender LTX M/SMichelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 95 63
Dry 98 75
Wet 96 55
Snow 82 50
Comfort 96 70
Noise 95 –
Treadwear 97 64
Handling 97 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Defender LTX M/S

The Michelin Defender LTX M/S is widely regarded as a premier all-season tire for trucks and SUVs, consistently praised for its exceptional tread longevity and balanced performance across various weather conditions. While the vast majority of users report superior ride comfort, stability, and fuel efficiency, a small minority of owners have noted issues with increased road noise as the tires age or inconsistent traction in specific wet-weather scenarios.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life often exceeding 60,000–80,000 miles
  • Strong all-weather traction, particularly in dry and light snow conditions
  • Improved fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
  • High level of ride comfort and stability for heavy vehicles
  • Reliable performance that often outperforms original equipment (OE) tires

Cons

  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tire tread wears down
  • Higher price point compared to competitors
  • Occasional reports of reduced wet-weather grip or traction loss during turns
  • Limited off-road capability in mud or deep sand

Observations

  • Heavy-duty truck owners (RAM 2500/3500) report high satisfaction with durability, even under heavy usage or towing conditions.
  • SUV owners (Expedition, Highlander) frequently cite the tire as a significant upgrade over factory-installed rubber, specifically noting improvements in cabin quietness and fuel economy.
  • Users recommend running higher tire pressures (40-45 psi) to optimize performance and handling on certain truck platforms.
Tire B Michelin Energy Saver A/S

The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
  • Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations

Observations

  • Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
  • Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tirePremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Michelin

Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 96 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 97 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 97 vs 67 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.