65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Nexen N9000 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N9000 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N9000 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 84 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N9000 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 52 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N9000 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N9000 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N9000 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Nexen N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 79 |
| Dry | 75 | 84 |
| Wet | 55 | 80 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 70 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 77 |
| Handling | 67 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
The Nexen N9000 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that offers impressive dry and wet road performance, often compared favorably to more expensive premium brands. While user experiences regarding noise levels and tread longevity are polarized, the consensus suggests it is an excellent choice for daily driving, provided it is not pushed to track-day extremes.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet weather traction and water evacuation capabilities
- Aesthetically pleasing tread pattern and sidewall profile
- Generally quiet operation for daily road use
Cons
- Inconsistent reports regarding cabin noise levels
- Faster tread wear compared to premium-tier tires
- Soft sidewall construction limits suitability for track use
- Poor performance in mud or loose surface conditions
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles like the Mazda3 noted that the tire performs well but is susceptible to accelerated wear on front-drive axles.
- Owners of 4WD vehicles reported that the tire suits the drivetrain characteristics exceptionally well.
- Drivers of vehicles known for high cabin noise, such as the 2011 Mazda3, noted that the tire's noise profile is comparable to premium alternatives.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Nexen N9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Michelin
79
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N9000 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N9000 scores 80 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N9000 scores 77 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N9000 scores 80 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N9000 scores 84 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Nexen N9000
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
Nexen N9000 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.