88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy X2+ vs Yokohama AS430 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 50 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy X2+ | Yokohama AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 71 |
| Dry | 89 | 85 |
| Wet | 87 | 75 |
| Comfort | 87 | 83 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 63 |
| Handling | 89 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy XM2+ is widely regarded as a high-performing, durable tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride. Users consistently praise its ability to balance longevity with responsive handling, making it a reliable choice for daily driving across various road surfaces.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Responsive steering and improved handling characteristics
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted tires on compact sedans report significant improvements in steering response and high-speed stability.
- Drivers of MPVs and SUVs noted that the tire maintains excellent composure and prevents aquaplaning even when driving through deep water at highway speeds.
The Yokohama AS430 receives a polarized reception from users, with experiences ranging from high satisfaction regarding noise levels and wet-weather traction to significant disappointment regarding tread longevity. While some drivers praise its balanced performance in varied conditions, others report premature wear that falls short of expectations for the tire's class.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry surface grip
- Surprisingly quiet ride quality
- Reliable performance in rainy climates
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Inconsistent durability across different driving styles
- Lack of longevity compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users driving compact sedans like the Mazda3 reported dissatisfaction with the tire's longevity, noting a loss of grip after approximately 25,000 miles.
- Performance-oriented drivers noted the tire's capability in diverse conditions, though long-term wear remains a point of contention.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy X2+ | B · Yokohama AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Michelin
71
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 89 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 87 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 87 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 89 vs 85 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy X2+
Tire B · Yokohama AS430
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy X2+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.