78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
55 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy XM2 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 59 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 65 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 72 |
| Dry | 81 | 72 |
| Wet | 74 | 59 |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 87 |
| Handling | 74 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy XM2 is widely regarded as a durable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in tread life and reliability for daily commuting. While many users praise its comfort and consistent performance, opinions are polarized regarding noise levels and wet-weather grip, with some drivers finding them exceptionally quiet and others reporting significant road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
- High levels of ride comfort
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Inconsistent performance feedback regarding wet-weather traction
Observations
- Users with smaller hatchbacks and sedans frequently report high satisfaction with comfort and fuel efficiency.
- Drivers of heavier or higher-torque vehicles occasionally noted that the soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and less precise handling.
- Owners of vehicles with smaller wheel diameters (15-16 inch) often view the tire as a significant upgrade over budget stock options.
The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
- Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
- Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
- Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Michelin
72
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 74 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 81 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 78 vs 74 on handling.
Tire A · Michelin Energy XM2
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy XM2 also compared with
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.