72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
57
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
49/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 33 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 45 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 57 |
| Dry | 72 | 68 |
| Wet | 59 | 50 |
| Comfort | 65 | 33 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 80 |
| Handling | 78 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
57
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
- Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
- Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
- Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
The Yokohama BluEarth E51 receives a mixed to negative reception from users, primarily due to its performance as an OEM-fitted tire on luxury vehicles like the Lexus NX300h. While some owners appreciate its longevity and tread wear, many report significant issues with cabin noise, ride harshness, and inconsistent wet-weather traction.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Lack of refinement for luxury vehicle applications
Observations
- Lexus NX300h owners frequently report that the tire's stiff sidewalls and high noise levels detract from the vehicle's intended luxury experience.
- Users noted that the tire's performance limitations become apparent during rapid direction changes, highlighting its unsuitability for spirited driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Yokohama
57
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 78 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 65 vs 33 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 59 vs 50 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 87 vs 80 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth also compared with
Yokohama Bluearth E51 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.