67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Sumitomo H/TR T4 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Sumitomo H/TR T4 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 59 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
H/TR T4 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 65 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
H/TR T4 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Sumitomo H/TR T4 | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 72 |
| Dry | 60 | 72 |
| Wet | 40 | 59 |
| Comfort | 80 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 100 | 87 |
| Handling | 50 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Sumitomo H/TR T4 is perceived as a functional, budget-oriented tire suitable for routine daily commuting. It is not designed for performance-oriented driving, serving best as a reliable option for standard passenger vehicle use.
Pros
- Adequate for daily driving needs
- Cost-effective solution for standard vehicles
Cons
- Lacks performance capabilities
- Not suitable for spirited or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users emphasize that the tire is best suited for general passenger vehicles rather than performance-focused platforms.
The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
- Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
- Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
- Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Sumitomo H/TR T4 | B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Sumitomo
72
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Sumitomo H/TR T4 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 78 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 59 vs 40 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Sumitomo H/TR T4 scores 80 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Sumitomo H/TR T4 scores 100 vs 87 on treadwear.
Tire A · Sumitomo H/TR T4
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
More comparisons
Also compared with
Sumitomo H/TR T4 also compared with
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.