Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Turanza T005 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
88/100
36 professional tests
User signal (40%)
72/100
181 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
81
Comfort
69
Noise
81
Treadwear
66
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
59
Comfort
65
Noise
–
Treadwear
87
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if treadwear and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
84
B — Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
72
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Aspec A349 BluEarth
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 –
Tire Rack owners 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 72

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 22
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
81
B — Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
59
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Aspec A349 BluEarth
Professional tests (TWG score) 83 –
Tire Rack owners 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 59

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 4
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
69
B — Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
65
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Aspec A349 BluEarth
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 65

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
81
B — Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
–
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Aspec A349 BluEarth
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 21
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
66
B — Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
87
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Aspec A349 BluEarth
Tire Rack owners 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 6
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
72
B — Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
78
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Aspec A349 BluEarth
Tyre Reviews owners 72 78
DriverReviews owners 84 –

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Relative Score 74 72
Dry 84 72
Wet 81 59
Comfort 69 65
Noise 81 –
Treadwear 66 87
Handling 72 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza T005

The Bridgestone Turanza T005 is a polarizing touring tire that excels in wet-weather safety and fuel efficiency but faces significant criticism regarding its longevity and ride comfort. While many users praise its wet-road confidence and predictable handling, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature tread wear, sidewall cracking, and high road noise, leading to a highly divided consensus.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Predictable and safe handling for daily commuting
  • Strong dry-road braking performance

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
  • High levels of road noise and cabin resonance
  • Reports of sidewall cracking and premature aging
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and lack of precision

Observations

  • Users with high-torque EVs and performance-oriented vehicles frequently report excessive wheel spin and rapid wear due to the tire's compound.
  • Drivers of premium sedans (BMW, Audi) often note a significant improvement in comfort when switching from run-flat tires to the T005, though some find the ride still too firm.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those driving on poor-quality road surfaces report that the soft sidewalls are vulnerable to impact damage and bubbling.
Tire B Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
  • Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
  • Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Mixed

Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided. While some drivers praise its wet-weather performance, highway stability, and value compared to competitors like Michelin, others report issues with excessive road noise, stiff comfort levels, rapid wear, and poor grip in certain conditions.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Road noise and comfort#Treadwear and durability#Run-flat performance#Price and value

Based on 23 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available24—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if treadwear and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 81 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 87 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 84 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 78 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005
Tire B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.