Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 80 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 70 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 95 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Aspec A349 BluEarth | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 90 |
| Dry | 72 | 95 |
| Wet | 59 | 93 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | 65 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 90 |
| Handling | 78 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
- Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
- Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
- Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 59 on wet.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 89 vs 65 on comfort.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 72 on dry.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 87 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.