Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Michelin Latitude Cross vs Yokohama G012 A/T — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 88 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 85 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 68 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 93 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Cross | Yokohama G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 91 |
| Dry | 86 | 94 |
| Wet | 84 | 93 |
| Snow | 74 | 97 |
| Comfort | 82 | 85 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 91 |
| Handling | 76 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Latitude Cross is widely regarded as a high-performing, versatile all-terrain tire that excels as a 'best-of-both-worlds' compromise for SUV and 4x4 owners. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather grip, impressive longevity, and off-road capability, noting it significantly outperforms standard factory-fitted tires in mixed-terrain conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and resistance to aquaplaning
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong off-road performance on mud, gravel, and grass
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on-road manners for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp rocks and punctures
- Increased fuel consumption compared to road-biased tires
- Performance degradation and hardening of the rubber compound over long-term aging (5+ years)
- Occasional reports of increased road noise at high motorway speeds
Observations
- Heavy 4x4 and SUV owners (e.g., Land Cruiser, Defender) report excellent load-carrying stability and longevity.
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted Bridgestone Duelers consistently report a 'night and day' improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence.
- Small 4x4 owners (e.g., Suzuki Jimny, Panda Cross) note improved off-road capability without sacrificing daily driving comfort.
The Yokohama Geolandar G012 A/T is widely regarded as a highly capable, aggressive all-terrain tire that excels in demanding off-road environments, including mud, gravel, and snow. While users consistently praise its deep tread depth and rugged durability, they acknowledge that these performance benefits come with trade-offs in road noise and fuel efficiency. Overall, it is viewed as a high-value, reliable choice for truck and SUV owners who prioritize off-road traction and sidewall strength.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, clay, and loose terrain
- Deep tread depth providing long-lasting wear
- Robust sidewall construction and durability
- Strong performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Noticeable road noise at highway speeds
- Negative impact on fuel economy due to weight and rolling resistance
- Occasional balancing challenges on certain heavy-duty truck wheels
- Potential for wandering or tracking issues on paved surfaces
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (Ram 2500, F-250) report excellent load-hauling performance but note faster tread wear when towing heavy equipment.
- SUV owners (Subaru Forester/Outback) highlight the tire's ability to complement AWD systems on unsealed, rural roads.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Cross | B · Yokohama G012 A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama G012 A/T — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 97 vs 74 on snow.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 93 vs 84 on wet.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 94 vs 86 on dry.
Yokohama G012 A/T scores 83 vs 76 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.