65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Michelin Energy Saver A/S and Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Energy Saver A/S is stronger on treadwear and handling. Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 is stronger on comfort and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 59 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 52 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 54 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver A/S leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver A/S | Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 62 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 64 |
| Dry | 75 | 77 |
| Wet | 55 | 59 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 70 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 54 |
| Handling | 67 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy Saver AS receives a mixed reception, primarily valued for its fuel efficiency and longevity in specific conditions, but frequently criticized for inconsistent tread life and poor performance in wet or cold weather. While some long-term users report exceptional durability, many modern drivers find the tire's grip and noise levels inadequate for daily commuting.
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
- Unsettling braking performance in emergency situations
Observations
- Hybrid and EV owners, such as those with the Ford Fusion Hybrid and Nissan Leaf, report faster-than-expected tread wear.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in cold and wet climates, are often perceived as inferior to dedicated winter or performance-oriented tires.
The Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 receives a polarized reception, often serving as a polarizing OEM fitment that struggles to meet the high performance expectations associated with the Michelin brand. While some users appreciate their initial comfort and longevity, a significant portion of the user base reports concerning performance deficiencies in wet and winter conditions, alongside reports of premature sidewall degradation.
Pros
- Acceptable tread life for some users under specific driving conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality when new
- Reliable performance for moderate, dry-weather driving
Cons
- Poor traction and safety concerns on wet surfaces
- Inadequate performance in winter conditions despite M+S rating
- Reports of sidewall tearing and tread delamination
- High price point relative to perceived performance
Observations
- Users driving performance-oriented vehicles like the Civic Si and BMW Z3 report that the tire's handling characteristics are insufficient for their vehicle's capabilities.
- Owners of AWD vehicles noted that the tire failed to provide expected confidence in adverse weather, contradicting the benefits of their drivetrain.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Michelin
64
/ 100
Michelin
Too close to call: Michelin Energy Saver A/S and Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Energy Saver A/S is stronger on treadwear and handling. Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 is stronger on comfort and wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 64 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 scores 77 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 67 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 scores 59 vs 55 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver A/S also compared with
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.