Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Nexen

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661

Summer Touring tires

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
74
Comfort
76
Treadwear
80
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama A.Drive

Premium Touring Summer tire

Yokohama A.Drive tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
28 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
64
Comfort
70
Treadwear
79
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 4
A — Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
81
B — Yokohama A.Drive
77
Why this score
SourceArrowspeed CP661A.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 81 77

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 10
A — Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
74
B — Yokohama A.Drive
64
Why this score
SourceArrowspeed CP661A.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 74 64

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 6
A — Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
76
B — Yokohama A.Drive
70
Why this score
SourceArrowspeed CP661A.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 76 70

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 1
A — Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
80
B — Yokohama A.Drive
79
Why this score
SourceArrowspeed CP661A.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 80 79

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 6
A — Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
75
B — Yokohama A.Drive
69
Why this score
SourceArrowspeed CP661A.Drive
Tyre Reviews owners 75 69

Scores at a glance

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 vs Yokohama A.Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen Arrowspeed CP661Yokohama A.Drive
Relative Score 77 72
Dry 81 77
Wet 74 64
Comfort 76 70
Treadwear 80 79
Handling 75 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Nexen Arrowspeed CP661

The Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that delivers reliable performance for daily commuting and light-duty vehicles. While some users report concerns regarding long-term sidewall integrity, the consensus highlights a favorable balance of wet-weather grip, low road noise, and impressive tread longevity for the price point.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • High tread longevity and durability on light vehicles
  • Predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise levels

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or splitting
  • Performance limitations during high-speed wet weather driving
  • Initial 'loose' feeling during the break-in period

Observations

  • Users report excellent longevity on light, low-powered vehicles like the Fiat Punto and Toyota Yaris, with some achieving over 30,000 miles.
  • The tire is noted to handle the soft suspension of smaller hatchbacks effectively, providing stable cornering despite vehicle limitations.
Tire B Yokohama A.Drive

The Yokohama A Drive is a polarizing tire that generally serves as an entry-level or mid-range option, receiving mixed feedback regarding its performance. While some users appreciate its value and dry-weather handling, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding wet-weather traction, high road noise, and inconsistent tread life.

Pros

  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
  • Solid durability and tread life for many users
  • Generally comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
  • Stiff sidewalls reported by some users as a negative

Observations

  • Users driving smaller hatchbacks and sedans like the Toyota Corolla and Fiat Punto reported mixed experiences, with some noting premature sidewall wear.
  • Drivers of heavier or more powerful vehicles expressed dissatisfaction with the tire's ability to handle high-speed stability and wet-weather cornering.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 B · Yokohama A.Drive
CategorySummer Touring tiresPremium Touring Summer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen

Yokohama

Winner: Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 74 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 76 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 75 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 81 vs 77 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.