77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 40 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Arrowspeed CP661 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Arrowspeed CP661 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 73 |
| Dry | 81 | 78 |
| Wet | 74 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 76 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 87 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 72 |
| Handling | 75 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that delivers reliable performance for daily commuting and light-duty vehicles. While some users report concerns regarding long-term sidewall integrity, the consensus highlights a favorable balance of wet-weather grip, low road noise, and impressive tread longevity for the price point.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- High tread longevity and durability on light vehicles
- Predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise levels
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking or splitting
- Performance limitations during high-speed wet weather driving
- Initial 'loose' feeling during the break-in period
Observations
- Users report excellent longevity on light, low-powered vehicles like the Fiat Punto and Toyota Yaris, with some achieving over 30,000 miles.
- The tire is noted to handle the soft suspension of smaller hatchbacks effectively, providing stable cornering despite vehicle limitations.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Nexen
73
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 76 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 80 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 81 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 81 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.