85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
108 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Nexen N Fera SU4 and Toyo Proxes CF2 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera SU4 is stronger on wet and dry. Toyo Proxes CF2 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 82 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | N Fera SU4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 85 |
| Dry | 91 | 88 |
| Wet | 87 | 82 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 88 | 86 |
| Noise | 91 | – |
| Treadwear | 82 | 85 |
| Handling | 80 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
The Toyo Proxes CF2 is widely regarded as a high-value, well-rounded touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and wet-weather performance. While a small subset of users reported issues with premature hardening or structural cracking, the vast majority of drivers praise its predictable handling and impressive longevity, often comparing it favorably to more expensive premium brands.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling
- Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
- Low rolling resistance contributing to fuel efficiency
Cons
- Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
- Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
- Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
- Occasional reports of structural failure or premature wear on specific vehicles
Observations
- Users with compact cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Toyota Yaris) frequently report significant improvements in ride quality and noise levels over factory-fitted tires.
- Drivers of older or lighter vehicles often highlight the tire's ability to provide a 'predictable' and 'fun' driving experience, though some note that the soft sidewalls are less suited for high-performance sports driving.
- Owners in hot climates (e.g., Greece, Cyprus) noted that the rubber compound may be prone to premature aging or cracking compared to temperate regions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
Nexen
85
/ 100
Toyo
Too close to call: Nexen N Fera SU4 and Toyo Proxes CF2 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera SU4 is stronger on wet and dry. Toyo Proxes CF2 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 82 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 88 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 85 vs 82 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 83 vs 80 on handling.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
Toyo Proxes CF2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.