Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N FERA SUR4G vs Michelin Energy X2+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Energy X2+ is ahead, 75–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ANexen

N FERA SUR4G

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Tests 70 · 1 test Owners 59 · 5 reviews

Tire BMichelin

Energy X2+

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Energy X2+ +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN FERA SUR4GEnergy X2+
    Professional tests (TWG score)62–
    Reviews found online6678
  2. 75

    Wet

    Energy X2+ +4
    79
    Why this score
    SourceN FERA SUR4GEnergy X2+
    Professional tests (TWG score)78–
    Reviews found online7182
  3. 58

    Comfort

    Energy X2+ +14
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN FERA SUR4GEnergy X2+
    Reviews found online4776
  4. 53

    Treadwear

    Energy X2+ +19
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN FERA SUR4GEnergy X2+
    Reviews found online4477
  5. 57

    Handling

    Energy X2+ +20
    77
    Why this score
    SourceN FERA SUR4GEnergy X2+
    Reviews found online5777
Scores at a glance
Nexen N FERA SUR4G vs Michelin Energy X2+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N FERA SUR4GMichelin Energy X2+
Relative Score 62 75
Dry 63 75
Wet 75 79
Comfort 58 72
Treadwear 53 72
Handling 57 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

N FERA SUR4G

Energy X2+

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N FERA SUR4G

Pros

  • Insane level of grip on both dry and wet surfaces
  • Exceptional performance in unexpected rain conditions during track events
  • Competitive pricing compared to alternatives like the RS4

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short overall tire lifespan
  • Requires careful driving speeds in heavy rain after a certain threshold
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4G review

Tire B Energy X2+

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
  • High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
  • Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
  • Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
All owner themes in the Energy X2+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N FERA SUR4G B · Michelin Energy X2+
CategorySummer Extreme Performance tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N FERA SUR4G

Michelin Energy X2+

Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 77 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Energy X2+ scores 75 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen N FERA SUR4G
Tire B · Michelin Energy X2+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

75

Leads

Energy X2+

Amazon