Tests 70 · 1 test Owners 59 · 5 reviews
Nexen N FERA SUR4G vs Michelin Energy X2+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy X2+ is ahead, 75–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Energy X2+ +1275Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Energy X2+ Professional tests (TWG score) 62 – Reviews found online 66 78 -
75
Wet
Energy X2+ +479Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Energy X2+ Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 71 82 -
58
Comfort
Energy X2+ +1472Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Energy X2+ Reviews found online 47 76 -
53
Treadwear
Energy X2+ +1972Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Energy X2+ Reviews found online 44 77 -
57
Handling
Energy X2+ +2077Why this score
Source N FERA SUR4G Energy X2+ Reviews found online 57 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N FERA SUR4G | Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 75 |
| Dry | 63 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 79 |
| Comfort | 58 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 72 |
| Handling | 57 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
N FERA SUR4G
Energy X2+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N FERA SUR4G
Pros
- Insane level of grip on both dry and wet surfaces
- Exceptional performance in unexpected rain conditions during track events
- Competitive pricing compared to alternatives like the RS4
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall tire lifespan
- Requires careful driving speeds in heavy rain after a certain threshold
Tire B Energy X2+
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N FERA SUR4G | B · Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N FERA SUR4G
Michelin Energy X2+
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 77 vs 57 on handling.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 53 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 58 on comfort.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 75 vs 63 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.