73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
187 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecsta V730 vs Nexen N FERA SUR4G — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
72/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta V730 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4G if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta V730 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | 98 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA SUR4G leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 53 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 48 | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 55 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 65 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta V730 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 48 |
| SimpleTire owners | 84 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta V730 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 46 |
| SimpleTire owners | 84 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta V730 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta V730 | N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta V730 | Nexen N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 92 | 90 |
| Wet | 53 | 86 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | 48 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 75 | 46 |
| Handling | 88 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/8 · 2021 Track Day 200TW Tyre Test | 33% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | -16.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta V730 is widely regarded as a high-value, 'budget-friendly' 200TW tire that excels in dry track and autocross environments. While it may not reach the absolute peak lap times of top-tier 'Super 200' competitors, it offers exceptional consistency, heat tolerance, and longevity, making it a favorite for HPDE enthusiasts and budget-conscious racers.
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
- High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
- Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.
- Highly competitive price point offering significant value for money.
- Stiff sidewalls provide sharp, responsive turn-in and steering precision.
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
- Inconsistent performance when cold, leading to potential traction loss on street starts.
Observations
- Users with camber-limited vehicles (e.g., stock-class FWD cars) report that the stiff sidewalls and shoulder design handle limited negative camber well, resulting in even wear.
- Heavy vehicles (3500lbs+) note that while the tire handles the weight well, it requires careful pressure management to avoid overheating or premature shoulder wear.
- Drivers of lightweight platforms (e.g., Miata) report exceptional longevity, often getting an entire season of track and autocross use from a single set.
The Nexen N Fera SUR4G is widely regarded as a high-performance track-focused tire that delivers exceptional dry grip at a competitive price point. While users praise its track capabilities and surprising wet-weather performance, the tire is noted for its rapid tread wear, making it better suited for dedicated track use than daily driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry track grip
- Competitive pricing compared to rivals like the Hankook RS4
- Surprisingly capable performance in wet conditions
- Consistent performance during track events
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Not ideal for high-mileage daily driving
- Performance drops off significantly as the tire wears
Observations
- Users report the tire is highly effective for competitive track events and racing scenarios.
- The tire's longevity is significantly impacted by frequent track usage, with some users cycling through multiple sets per season.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta V730 | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Kumho
70
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Kumho Ecsta V730 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4G if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N FERA SUR4G scores 86 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 75 vs 46 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 73 vs 48 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 88 vs 83 on handling.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta V730
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4G
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta V730 also compared with
Nexen N FERA SUR4G also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.