69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Riken Raptor HR — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 60 | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy MXM4 | Riken Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 83 |
| Dry | 77 | 90 |
| Wet | 70 | 79 |
| Snow | 51 | 61 |
| Comfort | 66 | 90 |
| Noise | – | 89 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 87 |
| Handling | 64 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Primacy MXM4 is generally regarded as a comfort-oriented grand touring tire that excels in ride quality and tread longevity but falls short for performance-minded drivers. While users praise its ability to dampen road vibrations and maintain durability, many report lackluster handling, significant understeer, and underwhelming wet-weather traction when pushed.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Effective resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
- Increased road noise on certain surfaces
Observations
- Drivers of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheelspin and traction issues in wet conditions.
- Tesla Model 3 owners noted a decline in handling performance compared to dedicated summer tires, suggesting the tire is better suited for comfort than spirited driving.
- The tire's run-flat variants are noted for maintaining a surprisingly soft and compliant ride despite their reinforced construction.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 | B · Riken Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Grand Touring All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Michelin
83
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Riken Raptor HR — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Riken Raptor HR scores 91 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Riken Raptor HR scores 61 vs 51 on snow.
Tire A · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire B · Riken Raptor HR
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Primacy MXM4 also compared with
Riken Raptor HR also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.