Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Toyo Proxes R888R vs Yokohama Advan A10 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Toyo Proxes R888R tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
Owner ratings
Dry
92
Wet
54
Comfort
67
Noise
59
Treadwear
69
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan A10

Summer High Performance tires

Yokohama Advan A10 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
18 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
66
Comfort
45
Noise
–
Treadwear
55
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Toyo Proxes R888R — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan A10 if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 8
A — Toyo Proxes R888R
92
B — Yokohama Advan A10
84
Why this score
SourceProxes R888RAdvan A10
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 84
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan A10 leads by 12
A — Toyo Proxes R888R
54
B — Yokohama Advan A10
66
Why this score
SourceProxes R888RAdvan A10
Tire Rack owners 54 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 66
SimpleTire owners 65 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 22
A — Toyo Proxes R888R
67
B — Yokohama Advan A10
45
Why this score
SourceProxes R888RAdvan A10
Tire Rack owners 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 45
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Toyo Proxes R888R
59
B — Yokohama Advan A10
–
Why this score
SourceProxes R888RAdvan A10
SimpleTire owners 70 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 14
A — Toyo Proxes R888R
69
B — Yokohama Advan A10
55
Why this score
SourceProxes R888RAdvan A10
Tire Rack owners 69 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 55
SimpleTire owners 71 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 28
A — Toyo Proxes R888R
92
B — Yokohama Advan A10
64
Why this score
SourceProxes R888RAdvan A10
Tyre Reviews owners – 64

Scores at a glance

Toyo Proxes R888R vs Yokohama Advan A10: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes R888RYokohama Advan A10
Relative Score 72 62
Dry 92 84
Wet 54 66
Comfort 67 45
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 69 55
Handling 92 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Toyo Proxes R888R

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama Advan A10

The Yokohama Advan A10 is generally regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry weather conditions but suffers from significant longevity and durability issues. While users frequently praise its impressive dry grip and responsiveness, the consensus is marred by reports of rapid tread wear, premature sidewall cracking, and excessive road noise at highway speeds.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry weather traction and road-holding capabilities
  • High level of responsiveness and handling precision
  • Strong performance in warm, dry climates

Cons

  • Extremely short tread life with many reports of failure under 15,000 miles
  • High levels of cabin noise, particularly at speeds exceeding 50-65 mph
  • Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet, snowy, or icy conditions
  • Frequent reports of premature sidewall cracking

Observations

  • Mitsubishi Lancer owners frequently report premature sidewall cracking and uneven front-end tread wear.
  • Users noted that the tire's firm, performance-oriented compound can lead to a harsh ride quality that negatively impacts comfort on longer journeys.
  • AWD vehicle owners reported mixed results, with some finding the grip sufficient while others noted significant traction loss in damp conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes R888R B · Yokohama Advan A10
Category—Summer High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available48—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—
Tread depth6.3/32″—
UTQG100 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo

Yokohama

Winner: Toyo Proxes R888R — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan A10 if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes R888R scores 92 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes R888R scores 67 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes R888R scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan A10 scores 66 vs 54 on wet.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes R888R
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A10

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.