78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Vredestein Quatrac 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Vredestein Quatrac 2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on handling, snow and dry. Vredestein Quatrac 2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 81 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 2 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 59 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Vredestein Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 78 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 83 | 81 |
| Snow | 81 | 70 |
| Comfort | 83 | 86 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 85 |
| Handling | 74 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Vredestein Quatrac 2 is widely regarded as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in adverse weather conditions, particularly snow, ice, and wet surfaces. While users consistently praise its longevity and reliable traction, some note trade-offs in road noise and a slight reduction in fuel efficiency due to rolling resistance.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Consistent performance even as the tread wears down
Cons
- Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
- Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
- Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
- Occasional reports of susceptibility to punctures when new
Observations
- Users operating AWD vehicles, such as Subarus, report high satisfaction with the tire's versatility across varied terrains and climates.
- Drivers of diesel-powered sedans noted that the tire maintains superior grip levels compared to premium alternatives even as the tread approaches the end of its service life.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Vredestein Quatrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
78
/ 100
Vredestein
Too close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Vredestein Quatrac 2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on handling, snow and dry. Vredestein Quatrac 2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 85 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 74 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 81 vs 70 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.