87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 3 SUV | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 3 SUV | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 89 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 3 SUV | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 72 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 3 SUV | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 35 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 3 SUV leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 3 SUV | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 3 SUV | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 79 |
| Dry | 90 | 84 |
| Wet | 90 | 77 |
| Comfort | 67 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 35 |
| Treadwear | 93 | 86 |
| Handling | 87 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
87
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV is highly regarded by users for its exceptional tread longevity and reliable all-weather performance. Owners consistently report that the tire maintains strong grip across diverse conditions, including wet, dry, and winter environments, making it a dependable choice for high-mileage drivers.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong, consistent grip in wet and dry conditions
- Competent winter performance comparable to dedicated studless winter tires
- High confidence and stability at motorway speeds
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Minor reduction in grip during extreme winter conditions compared to fresh tires
Observations
- Users operating heavy 4WD vehicles report significantly higher mileage compared to original equipment tires.
- The tire maintains performance consistency even when the vehicle is fully loaded for long-distance travel.
The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
- Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
- Even and durable tread wear
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Observations
- SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
- Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
87
/ 100
Vredestein
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 90 vs 77 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 67 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 93 vs 86 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV scores 90 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac 3 SUV also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.