73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta vs Yokohama S.drive — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
65 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta and Yokohama S.drive are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta is stronger on comfort, wet and handling. Yokohama S.drive is stronger on treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ultrac SUV Sessanta leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac SUV Sessanta | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ultrac SUV Sessanta leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac SUV Sessanta | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 69 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ultrac SUV Sessanta leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac SUV Sessanta | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 68 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
S.drive leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac SUV Sessanta | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 45 | 71 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ultrac SUV Sessanta leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac SUV Sessanta | S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 77 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta | Yokohama S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 73 |
| Dry | 87 | 83 |
| Wet | 77 | 69 |
| Comfort | 90 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 45 | 71 |
| Handling | 83 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta is generally regarded as a capable mid-range tire that offers strong dry-weather handling and impressive cabin quietness. While users appreciate the structural integrity of the sidewalls and cornering feedback, the tire's longevity and performance in cold conditions remain points of contention.
Pros
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering feedback
- High levels of cabin comfort and low noise
- Robust sidewall construction compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short service life
- Reduced traction in cold or freezing temperatures
- Potential for uneven shoulder wear on specific vehicle geometries
Observations
- Users driving vehicles prone to outer-edge wear, such as the BMW 5 Series, noted that the tire's tread depth design may exacerbate existing alignment-related wear patterns.
The Yokohama S.Drive is a polarizing high-performance summer tire that excels in dry conditions with predictable, progressive handling and strong cornering grip. While many users praise its longevity and value, a significant portion of the user base reports inconsistent performance in wet weather, ranging from confidence-inspiring to dangerously slippery, alongside complaints regarding road noise and ride harshness.
Pros
- Predictable and progressive handling in dry conditions
- Strong dry-weather cornering grip and steering response
- Commendable tread life and durability for a performance-oriented tire
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Inconsistent and sometimes poor wet-weather traction
- Noticeable road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh ride quality
- Sensitivity to temperature and pressure, affecting grip levels
Observations
- Users with lightweight, mechanical-steering vehicles (e.g., older hatchbacks) often report improved handling and reduced understeer.
- High-horsepower vehicles (300+ BHP) frequently report that the tire struggles to put power down effectively compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires.
- Convertible owners noted that road noise is more pronounced due to the lack of cabin sound insulation.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta | B · Yokohama S.drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Ultra High Performance Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Vredestein
73
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta and Yokohama S.drive are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta is stronger on comfort, wet and handling. Yokohama S.drive is stronger on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama S.drive scores 71 vs 45 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta scores 90 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta scores 77 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta scores 83 vs 77 on handling.
Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta
Tire B · Yokohama S.drive
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein Ultrac SUV Sessanta also compared with
Yokohama S.drive also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.