Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook Winter i*cept RS vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Winter i*cept RS

Premium Touring Winter tire

Hankook Winter i*cept RS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
77
Snow
–
Comfort
82
Noise
–
Treadwear
90
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Vredestein

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Winter Ultra High Performance tires

Vredestein Wintrac Pro tread pattern
Objective (60%)
93/100
32 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
30 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
86
Snow
82
Comfort
79
Noise
71
Treadwear
87
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept RS if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 9
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
80
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
89
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 89
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 80 89

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 9
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
77
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 83
Tire Rack owners – 91
Tyre Reviews owners 77 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
–
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners – 88

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winter i*cept RS leads by 3
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
82
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
79
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 74
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners 82 87

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
–
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
71
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 71

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Winter i*cept RS leads by 3
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
90
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
87
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 90 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 5
A — Hankook Winter i*cept RS
77
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82
Why this score
SourceWinter i*cept RSWintrac Pro
Tyre Reviews owners 77 82

Scores at a glance

Hankook Winter i*cept RS vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Winter i*cept RSVredestein Wintrac Pro
Relative Score 82 85
Dry 80 89
Wet 77 86
Snow – 82
Comfort 82 79
Noise – 71
Treadwear 90 87
Handling 77 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Winter i*cept RS

The Hankook Winter i cept RS is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in snow and cold weather conditions. Users consistently praise its affordability and impressive traction, though it is noted to be less suited for high-speed motorway driving or warm, dry pavement.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in snowy conditions
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Low rolling resistance contributing to improved fuel efficiency
  • Durable tread life even with spirited driving

Cons

  • Not optimized for high-speed motorway performance
  • Soft compound feels unstable on dry, warm road surfaces
  • Limited performance in non-winter conditions

Observations

  • Users driving compact hatchbacks like the Alfa 147 and Fiat Grande Punto report excellent fuel economy gains compared to summer tires.
  • The tire is highly recommended for rural or out-of-town commuters who encounter frequent snow rather than long-distance highway drivers.
Tire B Vredestein Wintrac Pro

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that bridges the gap between dedicated winter traction and the handling characteristics of a summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather performance, steering feedback, and stability at high speeds, making it a favorite for owners of performance-oriented vehicles.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
  • Strong performance in cold, dry conditions
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable handling and confidence-inspiring snow traction

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
  • Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
  • Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
  • Some users noted reduced traction when starting from a standstill on deep snow

Observations

  • Performance sedan and coupe owners (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi S-series) report the tire maintains a 'summer-like' handling feel while providing necessary winter safety.
  • Heavy vehicle owners (SUVs/Vans) report mixed results; while some appreciate the stability, others noted uneven wear patterns or reduced cornering precision on heavy commercial chassis.
  • Drivers of high-horsepower RWD vehicles specifically highlight the tire's ability to manage torque and minimize wheelspin in cold conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro
CategoryPremium Touring Winter tireWinter Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Vredestein

Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept RS if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 89 vs 80 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 86 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 82 vs 77 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 82 vs 79 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS
Tire B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.