83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
32 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
30 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Vredestein Wintrac Pro has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Wintrac Pro | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Wintrac Pro | Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | – |
| Dry | 89 | – |
| Wet | 86 | – |
| Snow | 82 | – |
| Comfort | 79 | – |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 87 | – |
| Handling | 82 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
–
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 7% #14/17 · 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | +9.5 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that bridges the gap between dedicated winter traction and the handling characteristics of a summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather performance, steering feedback, and stability at high speeds, making it a favorite for owners of performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
- Strong performance in cold, dry conditions
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and confidence-inspiring snow traction
Cons
- Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
- Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
- Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
- Some users noted reduced traction when starting from a standstill on deep snow
Observations
- Performance sedan and coupe owners (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi S-series) report the tire maintains a 'summer-like' handling feel while providing necessary winter safety.
- Heavy vehicle owners (SUVs/Vans) report mixed results; while some appreciate the stability, others noted uneven wear patterns or reduced cornering precision on heavy commercial chassis.
- Drivers of high-horsepower RWD vehicles specifically highlight the tire's ability to manage torque and minimize wheelspin in cold conditions.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Wintrac Pro | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Vredestein
–
/ 100
Yokohama
Only Vredestein Wintrac Pro has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein Wintrac Pro also compared with
Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.