83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama A041 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
50
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
49/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 70 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 55 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 43
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 45 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 52
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 35 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | G Fit 4S | A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 55 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G Fit 4S | Yokohama A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 50 |
| Dry | 72 | 70 |
| Wet | 83 | 55 |
| Snow | 76 | – |
| Comfort | 88 | 45 |
| Noise | 100 | – |
| Treadwear | 87 | 35 |
| Handling | 84 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
50
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Laufenn G Fit 4S is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly all-weather tire that benefits from its association with Hankook manufacturing standards. Users consistently report impressive grip in both wet and snowy conditions, alongside a quiet and responsive driving experience that exceeds expectations for its price point.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong wet weather performance and cornering grip
- Impressive traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- High durability and slow tread wear
Cons
- Increased road noise noted at higher speeds (above 100 km/h)
- Limited long-term data on tread life beyond initial break-in periods
Observations
- Users report high satisfaction when fitted to compact hatchbacks like the Vauxhall Corsa and Skoda Fabia.
- Performance remains consistent across various road surfaces, including steep rural inclines.
The Yokohama A041 receives poor feedback from users, characterized by significant concerns regarding durability and reliability. Owners report premature tread wear and frequent issues with tire integrity, leading to a consensus of dissatisfaction with the product's longevity and performance.
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear
- Poor wet weather performance
- Frequent issues with flats and structural integrity
Observations
- Users report the tire failing to meet basic longevity expectations, with tread reaching wear bars in under 13,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G Fit 4S | B · Yokohama A041 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Laufenn
50
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 87 vs 35 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 88 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 84 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 83 vs 55 on wet.
Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Yokohama A041
More comparisons
Also compared with
Laufenn G Fit 4S also compared with
Yokohama A041 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.