82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
420 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if snow and noise matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 97% | 92% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 40 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 79 |
| Dry | 85 | 77 |
| Wet | 89 | 81 |
| Snow | 60 | 80 |
| Comfort | 95 | 65 |
| Noise | 72 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 77 |
| Handling | 85 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #4/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 92% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +5.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #3/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -0.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 85% #10/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +13.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #4/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #15/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | -0.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 14% #7/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +35.7 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 98% #7/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -3.8 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 80% #9/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +20 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 60% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +20 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 89% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 80% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +9 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 92% #16/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +4.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise levels over many OEM and run-flat alternatives. While most users praise its confidence-inspiring handling and daily drivability, a subset of enthusiasts notes that its softer sidewall construction can lead to a less precise steering feel compared to stiffer, more track-focused competitors.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Effective rim protection design
- Strong value-to-performance ratio
- Excellent braking performance
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can feel 'spongy' or imprecise during aggressive cornering
- Rapid tread wear reported by spirited drivers
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage from potholes
- Performance drop-off as tread depth decreases
Observations
- Users replacing factory run-flat tires on BMW and other luxury vehicles report a transformative improvement in ride quality and reduced tramlining.
- Drivers of high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles note significant improvements in traction and reduced wheel hop compared to previous tires.
- Some users on larger rim diameters (18-19 inch) report increased noise and vulnerability to sidewall damage on poor road surfaces.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Goodyear
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if snow and noise matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 95 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 80 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 92 vs 72 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 85 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.