Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
25 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
384 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
85
Snow
–
Comfort
62
Noise
84
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Summer Max Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
74/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
420 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
89
Snow
60
Comfort
95
Noise
72
Treadwear
80
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Falken Azenis FK510 if noise matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 5
A — Falken Azenis FK510
80
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
85
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 81
Tire Rack owners 89 88
Tyre Reviews owners 88 91
SimpleTire owners 97 90
Dry Braking (% of best) 97% 97%
Dry Handling (% of best) 97% 98%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 4
A — Falken Azenis FK510
85
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
89
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 89
Tire Rack owners 86 82
Tyre Reviews owners 88 89
SimpleTire owners 91 90
Wet Braking (% of best) 99% 97%
Wet Handling (% of best) 100% 99%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken Azenis FK510
–
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
60
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
SimpleTire owners 75 40

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 33
A — Falken Azenis FK510
62
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
95
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Professional tests (TWG score) 49 100
Tire Rack owners 83 81
Tyre Reviews owners 77 87
SimpleTire owners 95 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 12
A — Falken Azenis FK510
84
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
72
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Professional tests (TWG score) 73 79
SimpleTire owners 88 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 5
A — Falken Azenis FK510
75
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
80
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Tire Rack owners 77 70
Tyre Reviews owners 71 80
SimpleTire owners 80 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 leads by 4
A — Falken Azenis FK510
81
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
85
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Tyre Reviews owners 81 85
DriverReviews owners 86 84

Scores at a glance

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Relative Score 78 84
Dry 80 85
Wet 85 89
Snow – 60
Comfort 62 95
Noise 84 72
Treadwear 75 80
Handling 81 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 97% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 97% #4/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test -0.3 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 98% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test -0.6 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 98% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test -13.2 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #4/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test -0.1 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 33% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test -13.3 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 92% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test +2.4 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 78% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test -22.2 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 80% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 100% #1/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 89% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test +11 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 99% #4/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 97% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test +2.2 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test +1.2 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Tire B Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise levels over many OEM and run-flat alternatives. While most users praise its confidence-inspiring handling and daily drivability, a subset of enthusiasts notes that its softer sidewall construction can lead to a less precise steering feel compared to stiffer, more track-focused competitors.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • Superior ride comfort and low road noise
  • Effective rim protection design
  • Strong value-to-performance ratio
  • Excellent braking performance

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can feel 'spongy' or imprecise during aggressive cornering
  • Rapid tread wear reported by spirited drivers
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage from potholes
  • Performance drop-off as tread depth decreases

Observations

  • Users replacing factory run-flat tires on BMW and other luxury vehicles report a transformative improvement in ride quality and reduced tramlining.
  • Drivers of high-torque, front-wheel-drive vehicles note significant improvements in traction and reduced wheel hop compared to previous tires.
  • Some users on larger rim diameters (18-19 inch) report increased noise and vulnerability to sidewall damage on poor road surfaces.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6810
Rim diameters17″ – 22″18″ – 21″
Tread depth10/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG300 A A240 - 300 AA A
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure50 psi50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Goodyear

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Falken Azenis FK510 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 95 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 72 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 85 vs 80 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 80 vs 75 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.