80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
94/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
250 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is stronger on comfort, dry and wet. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on snow and noise.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 95% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 94% | 92% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 88 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 77 |
| Wet | 90 | 81 |
| Snow | 52 | 80 |
| Comfort | 82 | 65 |
| Noise | 72 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 77 |
| Handling | 88 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #9/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +2.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 75% #9/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 85% #10/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -10 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 97% #5/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | 99% #8/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -1.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 79% #6/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 68% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +10.9 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 8% #13/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +12.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | 98% #7/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 67% #12/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 80% #9/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -13.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 89% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 60% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +29 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 83% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 80% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +3.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% #6/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 92% #16/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #2/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | 97% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong braking performance
- Good rim protection features
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
- Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
- Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 - 500 A - AA A | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Goodyear
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is stronger on comfort, dry and wet. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on snow and noise.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 80 vs 52 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 92 vs 72 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 88 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.