Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 60 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 65 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 64 |
| Dry | 79 | 79 |
| Wet | 88 | 70 |
| Comfort | 72 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 52 |
| Handling | 67 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T001 receives a polarized reception from users, often serving as a divisive factory-fitted tire. While many drivers appreciate its dry-weather handling, steering feedback, and comfort, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Solid dry-weather grip and handling
- Responsive steering feedback
- Generally comfortable ride quality
- Good value for money at certain price points
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
- High road noise levels on certain surfaces
- Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall softness
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles frequently report understeer and rapid front-tire wear compared to rear-axle longevity.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-performance driving styles noted significantly lower mileage expectations than the tire's touring classification suggests.
- Some users on 17-inch and larger wheels noted that the tire's sidewall stiffness can lead to a harsh ride on imperfect road surfaces.
The Yokohama ADVAN Sport is a polarizing high-performance tire that receives widely divergent feedback from users. While some drivers praise its sharp steering response, predictable feedback, and dry-weather grip, a significant portion of the user base reports severe dissatisfaction regarding excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Excellent steering response and road feedback
- Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- High value for money when purchased at discounted or clearance pricing
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning concerns
- Harsh ride quality compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users with luxury sedans (e.g., Audi A7, Volvo S60) frequently cited the tire as being too noisy and harsh for daily commuting.
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles noted that while the tire performs well on the track, it often fails to meet longevity expectations for daily driving.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups reported faster-than-average tread degradation.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Yokohama
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T001 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 88 vs 70 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 72 vs 57 on comfort.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 63 vs 52 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.