88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy X2+ vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Michelin Energy X2+ if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy X2+ | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 90 |
| Dry | 89 | 95 |
| Wet | 87 | 93 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | 87 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 90 |
| Handling | 89 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy XM2+ is widely regarded as a high-performing, durable tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride. Users consistently praise its ability to balance longevity with responsive handling, making it a reliable choice for daily driving across various road surfaces.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Responsive steering and improved handling characteristics
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted tires on compact sedans report significant improvements in steering response and high-speed stability.
- Drivers of MPVs and SUVs noted that the tire maintains excellent composure and prevents aquaplaning even when driving through deep water at highway speeds.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy X2+ | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Michelin
90
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Michelin Energy X2+ if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 89 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 89 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 87 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 87 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Energy X2+
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy X2+ also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.