69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
62/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy MXV4+ vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy MXV4+ leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy MXV4+ leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVID ENVigor leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Energy MXV4+ | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 43 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy MXV4+ | Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 75 |
| Dry | 55 | 84 |
| Wet | 53 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 98 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 80 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 69 |
| Handling | 43 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy MXV4+ is widely regarded as a comfort-oriented touring tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality. While it is praised by some for its longevity and value as an OEM replacement, others report significant performance limitations, particularly regarding steering feedback and traction in high-temperature or high-speed conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement
Cons
- Poor steering response and handling precision
- Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
- Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
- Reduced traction in high-temperature environments
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's comfort-focused design is well-suited for mild, daily driving but becomes unsettling on larger or heavier vehicles at speeds exceeding 120km/h.
- Owners of mid-size sedans, such as the Subaru Legacy, reported a positive experience when using the tire as an upgrade from standard factory equipment.
The Yokohama AVID ENVigor is generally regarded as a capable grand touring tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering drivers a sense of security and responsiveness. While users appreciate its performance characteristics and lateral grip, some report concerns regarding road noise levels and ride stiffness compared to other premium alternatives.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip
- Excellent lateral stability and handling feel
- Reliable performance at highway speeds
- Good value as a grand touring option
Cons
- Higher road noise levels than some competitors
- Ride quality can feel firm or harsh on certain vehicles
- Mixed feedback regarding long-term tread life expectations
Observations
- Drivers of sport-oriented sedans like the Civic Si noted the tire provides excellent handling but can feel stiff during spirited driving.
- Users replacing OEM tires on mid-size sedans like the Mazda6 reported significant improvements in lateral feel and wet weather confidence.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy MXV4+ | B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Michelin
75
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 84 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 81 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 70 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 98 vs 73 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy MXV4+
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy MXV4+ also compared with
Yokohama AVID ENVigor also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.