Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth vs Yokohama AVID S33B — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
59
Snow
–
Comfort
65
Noise
–
Treadwear
87
Handling
78
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama AVID S33B

Yokohama AVID S33B tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
20/100
Owner ratings
Dry
64
Wet
50
Snow
34
Comfort
67
Noise
66
Treadwear
37
Handling
61
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 8
A
72
B
64
Why this score
SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 64
Tyre Reviews owners 72 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 9
A
59
B
50
Why this score
SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 51
Tyre Reviews owners 59 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
34
Why this score
SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 35

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S33B leads by 2
A
65
B
67
Why this score
SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 66
Tyre Reviews owners 65 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
66

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 50
A
87
B
37
Why this score
SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID S33B
Tire Rack owners – 39
Tyre Reviews owners 87 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Aspec A349 BluEarth leads by 17
A
78
B
61
Why this score
SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID S33B
Tyre Reviews owners 78 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryYokohama Aspec A349 BluEarthYokohama AVID S33B
Relative Score 72 53
Dry 72 64
Wet 59 50
Snow – 34
Comfort 65 67
Noise – 66
Treadwear 87 37
Handling 78 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

The Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is generally regarded as a competent, long-lasting original equipment tire that excels in dry-weather comfort and noise suppression. While users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in fair conditions, it is frequently criticized for lackluster wet-weather traction and a high price point relative to its performance capabilities.

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
  • Solid, predictable performance for daily, undemanding driving

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring performance in inclement weather

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles, such as MPVs, reported satisfactory tread wear despite the vehicle's weight.
  • Users noted that the tire performs adequately as an OEM fitment for standard passenger cars but lacks the performance characteristics desired for spirited driving.
Tire B Yokohama AVID S33B

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth B · Yokohama AVID S33B
CategorySummer Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 87 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 78 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 59 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 72 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S33B
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.