67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Sumitomo H/TR T4 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Sumitomo H/TR T4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
H/TR T4 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | H/TR T4 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Sumitomo H/TR T4 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 80 |
| Dry | 60 | 83 |
| Wet | 40 | 78 |
| Comfort | 80 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 100 | 75 |
| Handling | 50 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Sumitomo H/TR T4 is perceived as a functional, budget-oriented tire suitable for routine daily commuting. It is not designed for performance-oriented driving, serving best as a reliable option for standard passenger vehicle use.
Pros
- Adequate for daily driving needs
- Cost-effective solution for standard vehicles
Cons
- Lacks performance capabilities
- Not suitable for spirited or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users emphasize that the tire is best suited for general passenger vehicles rather than performance-focused platforms.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Sumitomo H/TR T4 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Sumitomo
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Sumitomo H/TR T4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 78 vs 40 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Sumitomo H/TR T4 scores 100 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 60 on dry.
Tire A · Sumitomo H/TR T4
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Sumitomo H/TR T4 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.