84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
79/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 vs Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
15 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 — better noise, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Winter V905 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 91 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 91% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 89 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 90% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 92 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 97% | 92% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 96% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 53
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 47 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Winter V905 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 | Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 76 |
| Dry | 80 | 88 |
| Wet | 84 | 81 |
| Snow | 82 | 79 |
| Comfort | 82 | 67 |
| Noise | 100 | 47 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 80 |
| Handling | 81 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
76
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 97% #12/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -5.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 92% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -13.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 97% #12/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +2.8 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 71% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 76% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -4.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 7% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +12.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 97% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 92% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +4.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #18/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 93% #9/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 94% #5/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 90% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +6.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +1.8 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented winter tire that performs reliably in mild to moderate winter conditions. While it excels in noise reduction and ride quality, user consensus is mixed regarding its performance in deep snow and its longevity, with some users noting a significant drop-off in grip as the tread wears down over several seasons.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low noise levels
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good traction in light to moderate snow and slush
Cons
- Noticeable decline in performance and grip as the tire ages/tread wears
- Struggles in deep snow or extreme winter conditions
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback during spirited driving
- Increased fuel consumption reported by some users
Observations
- BMW owners frequently use these as a comfortable alternative to factory run-flat tires, noting improved ride quality.
- Performance on RWD vehicles in deep snow is reported as inconsistent, with some users experiencing significant traction loss.
- Users with high-torque vehicles noted that the tire can struggle to put power down effectively on dry pavement.
The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 is widely regarded as a high-performing winter tire that excels in cold, wet, and snowy conditions, offering handling characteristics that closely mimic summer tires. While most users praise its traction and confidence-inspiring grip on varied surfaces, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and increased road noise compared to other premium alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and handling on snow and ice
- Strong performance on cold, wet, and dry pavement
- High level of steering precision and road feedback
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Reports of higher-than-average road noise
- Mixed feedback on tread longevity, with some users noting rapid wear
- Occasional understeer in wet conditions when temperatures are higher
- Reduced performance in deep slush compared to packed snow
Observations
- Users running these on performance-oriented vehicles like the Honda Civic Type R and BMW 330 Touring report high satisfaction with handling and grip.
- Drivers of 4x4 SUVs noted the tire holds up well under demanding, high-mileage usage, though some smaller vehicle owners reported faster wear on the front axle.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance Winter tire | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Hankook
76
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 — better noise, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 100 vs 47 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 82 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 scores 88 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 scores 87 vs 81 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.