78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better wet, snow and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 55 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 66 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 69 |
| Dry | 88 | 78 |
| Wet | 83 | 57 |
| Snow | 81 | 60 |
| Comfort | 83 | 78 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 79 |
| Handling | 74 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth receives a polarized reception, with users praising its exceptional cabin quietness, ride comfort, and improvements in fuel efficiency. However, these benefits are frequently overshadowed by significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and inconsistent tread longevity across various SUV models.
Pros
- Excellent cabin noise reduction and ride comfort
- Noticeable improvement in fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Strong performance on dry pavement
- Reliable durability for moderate, daily commuting
Cons
- Poor lateral grip and handling on wet surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Higher price point relative to performance consistency
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
Observations
- Users of midsize SUVs like the Honda CR-V reported high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
- Owners of heavier or more powerful vehicles, such as the Kia Sportage and Subaru Forester XT, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and compromised handling in adverse conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
69
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better wet, snow and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 81 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 79 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 88 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.