61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better snow, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 55 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 66 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 69 |
| Dry | 80 | 78 |
| Wet | 67 | 57 |
| Snow | 20 | 60 |
| Comfort | 50 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 79 |
| Handling | 57 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth receives a polarized reception, with users praising its exceptional cabin quietness, ride comfort, and improvements in fuel efficiency. However, these benefits are frequently overshadowed by significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction and inconsistent tread longevity across various SUV models.
Pros
- Excellent cabin noise reduction and ride comfort
- Noticeable improvement in fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Strong performance on dry pavement
- Reliable durability for moderate, daily commuting
Cons
- Poor lateral grip and handling on wet surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Higher price point relative to performance consistency
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
Observations
- Users of midsize SUVs like the Honda CR-V reported high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
- Owners of heavier or more powerful vehicles, such as the Kia Sportage and Subaru Forester XT, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and compromised handling in adverse conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
BFGoodrich
69
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better snow, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 60 vs 20 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 78 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 67 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 66 vs 57 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.