87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
97/100
21 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
99 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Continental SportContact 7 if handling and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
SportContact 7 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
SportContact 7 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 91 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 76 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 67 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
SportContact 7 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 82 |
| Dry | 92 | 94 |
| Wet | 85 | 88 |
| Comfort | 85 | 79 |
| Noise | – | 81 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 67 |
| Handling | 84 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
87
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 is widely regarded by users as an exceptional mid-range performance tire that punches well above its price point. It is consistently praised for its impressive longevity, reliable wet and dry grip, and stiff sidewall construction that enhances steering precision and reduces understeer.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
- High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
- Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.
- Strong value proposition as a mid-range tire that outperforms more expensive alternatives.
Cons
- Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
- Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
- Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
- Isolated complaints regarding aquaplaning performance in extremely heavy rain.
Observations
- Users driving front-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the Ford Mondeo, reported significantly better tread wear compared to premium alternatives like Pirelli PZero Rosso or Continental tires.
- Drivers of heavier or high-performance vehicles noted that the stiff sidewalls effectively mitigated understeer and improved handling agility.
The Continental SportContact 7 is widely regarded as a class-leading Ultra-High Performance tire, praised for its exceptional grip in both wet and dry conditions. While it consistently outperforms many competitors in handling and feedback, users frequently note a trade-off in tread longevity and, for some, a firmer, noisier ride compared to more comfort-oriented alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High levels of steering feedback and precision
- Strong performance in cold/damp conditions
- Excellent handling stability at high speeds
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Firm sidewalls can lead to a harsh ride quality
- Lower initial tread depth compared to some competitors
Observations
- High-torque and heavy performance vehicles (e.g., RS3, M4, Taycan) report significant improvements in traction but experience accelerated wear.
- Users on larger rim diameters (20-22 inch) generally report acceptable comfort, while those on smaller setups or stiffer suspension configurations occasionally find the ride quality too harsh.
- Some BMW owners noted specific handling instability when using non-star-rated versions of the tire, suggesting sensitivity to vehicle-specific OE tuning.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | B · Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
87
/ 100
BFGoodrich
82
/ 100
Continental
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Continental SportContact 7 if handling and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 89 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 85 vs 79 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental SportContact 7 scores 90 vs 84 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental SportContact 7 scores 88 vs 85 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Tire B · Continental SportContact 7
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 also compared with
Continental SportContact 7 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.