87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs Nitto NeoGen — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
NeoGen leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 20 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | Nitto NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 80 |
| Dry | 92 | 87 |
| Wet | 85 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 20 |
| Comfort | 85 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 73 |
| Handling | 84 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
87
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 is widely regarded by users as an exceptional mid-range performance tire that punches well above its price point. It is consistently praised for its impressive longevity, reliable wet and dry grip, and stiff sidewall construction that enhances steering precision and reduces understeer.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
- High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
- Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.
- Strong value proposition as a mid-range tire that outperforms more expensive alternatives.
Cons
- Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
- Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
- Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
- Isolated complaints regarding aquaplaning performance in extremely heavy rain.
Observations
- Users driving front-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the Ford Mondeo, reported significantly better tread wear compared to premium alternatives like Pirelli PZero Rosso or Continental tires.
- Drivers of heavier or high-performance vehicles noted that the stiff sidewalls effectively mitigated understeer and improved handling agility.
The Nitto NeoGen is widely regarded as a capable performance-oriented tire that excels in wet conditions and offers responsive handling for enthusiasts. While it provides a sporty driving experience, users note trade-offs in tread longevity and road noise, making it better suited for spirited driving than daily commuting.
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Responsive steering and sporty road feel
- Strong dry grip performance
- Aesthetically pleasing for enthusiasts
Cons
- Rapid tread wear under aggressive driving
- Noticeable road noise at highway speeds
- Conflicting reports regarding sidewall stiffness
- Limited performance in snow and cold conditions
Observations
- Users running 225/40R18 sizes reported poor grip performance in snowy conditions.
- Enthusiasts noted that the tire is popular for 'stretched' fitments due to its specific sidewall construction.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | B · Nitto NeoGen |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 23 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
87
/ 100
BFGoodrich
80
/ 100
Nitto
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 85 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 89 vs 73 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 92 vs 87 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Tire B · Nitto NeoGen
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.