Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs Continental CrossContact A/TR — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 89 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 81 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 74 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Profiler 2 | CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | Continental CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 80 |
| Dry | 92 | 89 |
| Wet | 85 | 81 |
| Comfort | 85 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 79 |
| Handling | 84 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 is widely regarded by users as an exceptional mid-range performance tire that punches well above its price point. It is consistently praised for its impressive longevity, reliable wet and dry grip, and stiff sidewall construction that enhances steering precision and reduces understeer.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
- High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
- Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.
- Strong value proposition as a mid-range tire that outperforms more expensive alternatives.
Cons
- Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
- Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
- Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
- Isolated complaints regarding aquaplaning performance in extremely heavy rain.
Observations
- Users driving front-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the Ford Mondeo, reported significantly better tread wear compared to premium alternatives like Pirelli PZero Rosso or Continental tires.
- Drivers of heavier or high-performance vehicles noted that the stiff sidewalls effectively mitigated understeer and improved handling agility.
The Continental CrossContact A/TR is widely regarded as a highly durable and versatile all-terrain tire, praised for its exceptional longevity and strong performance across varied road conditions. While most users report excellent traction in wet and snowy environments, a minority of owners have expressed concerns regarding ride comfort and inconsistent warranty support from the manufacturer.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong traction in both wet and dry road conditions
- Impressive snow and ice performance for an all-terrain tire
- Aesthetically pleasing tread and sidewall design
Cons
- Reports of a jarring or uncomfortable ride quality
- Inconsistent customer service regarding warranty claims
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
- Mixed feedback on hydroplaning resistance
Observations
- Users operating these tires on SUVs like the Mercedes ML report high confidence in challenging winter conditions.
- Owners of vehicles like the Subaru Forester have noted the tire's ability to maintain performance over extremely high mileage (exceeding 130,000 km).
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | B · Continental CrossContact A/TR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 - 680 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Continental
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 85 vs 74 on comfort.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 89 vs 79 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 85 vs 81 on wet.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 84 vs 80 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.