Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD

High Performance Summer tire

BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
1 owner review
Dry
100
Wet
60
Comfort
50
Treadwear
50
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force T/A KD leads by 8
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
92
B — BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
100
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Profiler 2g-Force T/A KD
Tyre Reviews owners 92 100

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 25
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
85
B — BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
60
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Profiler 2g-Force T/A KD
Tyre Reviews owners 85 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 35
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
85
B — BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
50
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Profiler 2g-Force T/A KD
Tyre Reviews owners 85 50

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 39
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
89
B — BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
50
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Profiler 2g-Force T/A KD
Tyre Reviews owners 89 50

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force Profiler 2 leads by 14
A — BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
84
B — BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
70
Why this score
Sourceg-Force Profiler 2g-Force T/A KD
Tyre Reviews owners 84 70

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
Relative Score 87 63
Dry 92 100
Wet 85 60
Comfort 85 50
Treadwear 89 50
Handling 84 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2

The BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 is widely regarded by users as an exceptional mid-range performance tire that punches well above its price point. It is consistently praised for its impressive longevity, reliable wet and dry grip, and stiff sidewall construction that enhances steering precision and reduces understeer.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
  • High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
  • Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.
  • Strong value proposition as a mid-range tire that outperforms more expensive alternatives.

Cons

  • Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
  • Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
  • Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
  • Isolated complaints regarding aquaplaning performance in extremely heavy rain.

Observations

  • Users driving front-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the Ford Mondeo, reported significantly better tread wear compared to premium alternatives like Pirelli PZero Rosso or Continental tires.
  • Drivers of heavier or high-performance vehicles noted that the stiff sidewalls effectively mitigated understeer and improved handling agility.
Tire B BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD

The BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD is highly regarded for its exceptional dry-weather performance and suitability for autocross applications. While users praise its grip and durability relative to its performance compound, it shows significant limitations in wet-weather conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and handling
  • Strong performance in autocross environments
  • Commendable tread life for a high-performance compound

Cons

  • Poor performance in wet conditions
  • Rapid tread wear when pushed to the limit

Observations

  • Users report the tire remains effective for up to 10,000 miles before reaching significant wear levels.
  • The compound is specifically noted as being well-suited for high-intensity driving scenarios like autocross.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 B · BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
CategoryHigh Performance Summer tireHigh Performance Summer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 89 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 85 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 85 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 84 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.