Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 86 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 89 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 88 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 83 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 84 |
| Dry | 84 | 86 |
| Wet | 84 | 89 |
| Snow | 89 | 80 |
| Comfort | 85 | 88 |
| Noise | 50 | – |
| Treadwear | 87 | 83 |
| Handling | 85 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
The Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme is widely regarded by users as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow, ice, and cold, wet conditions. While it offers exceptional traction and safety margins in harsh weather, users note that its performance degrades in warmer temperatures, where the compound becomes soft and handling feels less precise.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and stability in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in cold, wet, and greasy road conditions
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
- Noticeable improvement in handling and confidence over standard summer or all-season tires
Cons
- Reduced handling precision and 'squidgy' feel in temperatures above 13°C
- Initial stiffness or harsh ride quality during the break-in period
- Increased tread wear if used consistently in warm summer weather
- Less effective on clay-based mud when tread depth drops below 4mm
Observations
- Owners of heavy SUVs and 4x4s (e.g., Land Rover Freelander, Volvo XC90) frequently report that these tires transform vehicle capability in extreme winter conditions.
- Users noted that the tires significantly improved the handling of rear-wheel-drive vehicles, which are typically prone to losing traction in cold weather.
- Some users reported a harsh ride initially on larger wheel sizes, which improved significantly after a break-in period of approximately 2,000 miles.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | B · Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Vredestein
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better snow, handling and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme if wet and comfort matter most to you.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 80 on snow.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 78 on handling.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 89 vs 84 on wet.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 87 vs 83 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.