Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 72 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 69 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 75 |
| Dry | 90 | 84 |
| Wet | 90 | 70 |
| Snow | 99 | 70 |
| Comfort | 90 | 72 |
| Noise | 88 | – |
| Treadwear | 82 | 81 |
| Handling | 80 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is widely regarded as a premier dedicated winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice. While users acknowledge that the soft rubber compound leads to faster tread wear if used in warmer temperatures, the consensus is that the safety and handling benefits in harsh winter conditions far outweigh these longevity concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Significant improvement over all-season tires for winter handling
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Observations
- Users report excellent performance across a variety of vehicle types, including heavy SUVs like the BMW X5 and VW Touareg, as well as light trucks like the Ford F-150.
- Owners of hybrid vehicles noted that the tire's soft compound may wear more quickly under the specific torque characteristics of their vehicles.
- Some users successfully utilize oversized tire diameters for increased ground clearance in deep snow without sacrificing ride quality.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
- Robust construction and durability against road hazards
- Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
- Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
- Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration
Observations
- Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
- Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 48 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better snow, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 99 vs 70 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 70 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 72 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 80 vs 69 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.