Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2

Premium Touring Winter  tire

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
33 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
90
Snow
99
Comfort
90
Noise
88
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
19 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
70
Snow
70
Comfort
72
Noise
Treadwear
81
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better snow, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 6
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
90
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
84
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
Tire Rack owners 90 87
Tyre Reviews owners 82 84
SimpleTire owners 91

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 20
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
90
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
70
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
Tire Rack owners 92 88
Tyre Reviews owners 76 70
SimpleTire owners 93

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 29
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
99
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
70
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
Tire Rack owners 94 86
Tyre Reviews owners 98 70
SimpleTire owners 99

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
90
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
72
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
Tire Rack owners 88 85
Tyre Reviews owners 76 72
SimpleTire owners 92

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
88
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
SimpleTire owners 88

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 1
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
82
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
81
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
Tire Rack owners 84 81
Tyre Reviews owners 58 81
SimpleTire owners 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 11
A — Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
80
B — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
69
Why this score
SourceBlizzak DM-V2Blizzak LM-32
Tyre Reviews owners 80 69

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak DM-V2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Relative Score 88 75
Dry 90 84
Wet 90 70
Snow 99 70
Comfort 90 72
Noise 88
Treadwear 82 81
Handling 80 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2

The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is widely regarded as a premier dedicated winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice. While users acknowledge that the soft rubber compound leads to faster tread wear if used in warmer temperatures, the consensus is that the safety and handling benefits in harsh winter conditions far outweigh these longevity concerns.

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
  • High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Significant improvement over all-season tires for winter handling

Cons

  • Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
  • Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
  • Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users report excellent performance across a variety of vehicle types, including heavy SUVs like the BMW X5 and VW Touareg, as well as light trucks like the Ford F-150.
  • Owners of hybrid vehicles noted that the tire's soft compound may wear more quickly under the specific torque characteristics of their vehicles.
  • Some users successfully utilize oversized tire diameters for increased ground clearance in deep snow without sacrificing ride quality.
Tire B Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
  • Robust construction and durability against road hazards
  • Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
  • Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
  • Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
  • Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration

Observations

  • Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
  • Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
CategoryPremium Touring Winter  tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available48
Rim diameters15″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Bridgestone

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better snow, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 99 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 72 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 80 vs 69 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.