Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
VerdictOnly Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
84
B — Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Enasave 01 A/S
Tire Rack owners 87 71
Tyre Reviews owners 84 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
70
B — Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Enasave 01 A/S
Tire Rack owners 88 62
Tyre Reviews owners 70 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
70
B — Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Enasave 01 A/S
Tire Rack owners 86 43
Tyre Reviews owners 70 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
72
B — Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Enasave 01 A/S
Tire Rack owners 85 62
Tyre Reviews owners 72 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
81
B — Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Enasave 01 A/S
Tire Rack owners 81 55
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
69
B — Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Enasave 01 A/S
Tyre Reviews owners 69 –

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
Relative Score 75 –
Dry 84 –
Wet 70 –
Snow 70 –
Comfort 72 –
Treadwear 81 –
Handling 69 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
  • Robust construction and durability against road hazards
  • Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
  • Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
  • Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
  • Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration

Observations

  • Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
  • Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
Tire B Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—14″ – 16″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—340 A B
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Dunlop

Only Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Dunlop Enasave 01 A/S

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.