75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
89/100
19 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is stronger on treadwear. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 is stronger on wet, snow and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Cinturato Winter 2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Cinturato Winter 2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Cinturato Winter 2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 65 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Cinturato Winter 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 77 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 76 |
| Dry | 84 | 82 |
| Wet | 70 | 84 |
| Snow | 70 | 84 |
| Comfort | 72 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 60 |
| Handling | 69 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
76
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
- Robust construction and durability against road hazards
- Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
- Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
- Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration
Observations
- Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
- Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 is generally regarded as a highly capable winter tire that excels in wet and snowy conditions while providing a secure, planted feel. While users appreciate its safety and traction, there are notable concerns regarding its longevity and tread wear, as well as a shift toward a softer, touring-oriented handling profile compared to its predecessors.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in wet and snowy conditions
- Strong braking performance on dry surfaces
- High level of subjective road feedback and handling security
- Comfortable touring-oriented ride quality
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and concerns regarding overall tire longevity
- Less precise handling and feedback compared to sportier winter tires
- Increased road noise and fuel consumption noted by some users
- Softer sidewall feel which may not suit performance-oriented driving
Observations
- Users transitioning from the sportier Sottozero 3 noted a significant shift toward a touring-focused, less direct handling experience.
- The tire's performance is highly regarded for drivers seeking a balanced, safe option for cold, rainy, and occasional mountain winter conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | B · Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Sizes available | — | 8 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
76
/ 100
Pirelli
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is stronger on treadwear. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 is stronger on wet, snow and handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 81 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 scores 84 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 scores 84 vs 70 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 also compared with
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.