73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
70/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
64/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is stronger on treadwear and snow. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is stronger on noise and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 80 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 73 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 70 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 92% | 91% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 98% | 95% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 33 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 EVO leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 72 |
| Dry | 83 | 83 |
| Wet | 82 | 80 |
| Snow | 77 | 66 |
| Comfort | 70 | 71 |
| Noise | 36 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 65 |
| Handling | 76 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #10/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 97% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -0.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 98% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 87% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #2/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -4.9 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 84% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 68% #7/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +15.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 17% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 91% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 95% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +3.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 96% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #7/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -8.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 98% #10/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering drivers significant confidence in adverse weather. While it receives high praise for its traction and handling, user experiences are polarized regarding its longevity, noise levels, and performance on wet or dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
- Reliable braking performance in severe weather
- Satisfactory comfort levels for a dedicated winter tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- High noise levels on dry asphalt
- Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance on certain vehicle types
Observations
- High-torque or high-performance vehicles (e.g., DB11, tuned GTI) may experience increased traction control intervention or accelerated wear.
- Compatibility issues noted with specific AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester, where premature wear was reported.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is a polarizing winter tire that excels in wet and cold conditions but faces significant criticism regarding tread longevity and deep snow performance. While some users praise its handling and braking capabilities, others report rapid wear and diminished effectiveness as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance in wet and cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and handling characteristics
- Low noise levels when new
- Reliable traction in slushy environments
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short service life
- Below-average performance in deep snow compared to dedicated winter tires
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Diminished aquaplaning resistance over time
Observations
- Users reported premature wear issues on specific vehicles like the Subaru Forester, with some dealers advising against the fitment.
- The tire's soft compound, while beneficial for grip, leads to accelerated degradation when used in milder, dry winter conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Bridgestone
72
/ 100
Bridgestone
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is stronger on treadwear and snow. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO is stronger on noise and handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 54 vs 36 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 78 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 77 vs 66 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 83 vs 76 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.