81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
42 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Hankook Icebear W300 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental AllSeasonContact — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 64 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 71 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 74 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental AllSeasonContact | Hankook Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 70 |
| Dry | 79 | 76 |
| Wet | 86 | 64 |
| Snow | 79 | – |
| Comfort | 85 | 70 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 76 | 71 |
| Handling | 82 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental AllSeasonContact is widely regarded as a highly capable, balanced all-season tire that excels in wet and wintry conditions while maintaining respectable dry-road performance. Users frequently praise its superior steering feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in adverse weather, often positioning it as a strong competitor to the Michelin CrossClimate series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding tread longevity in hot climates and occasional noise issues.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and snow traction
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics
- High level of ride comfort and cabin refinement
- Precise steering feedback compared to segment rivals
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear in high-temperature summer conditions
- Occasional reports of road noise or specific frequency whining
- Mixed feedback on dry-road performance during extreme heat
- Some reports of premature tread cracking or durability issues
Observations
- Users with SUVs and heavier vehicles noted significant improvements in cabin noise and ride comfort compared to OE tires.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or AWD vehicles (e.g., Audi Quattro, Subaru Outback) report high confidence in snow and slush, though some note that aggressive acceleration can still break traction.
- Owners in hot climates (e.g., Greece, Southern Europe) report that the tire compound feels too soft during summer, leading to reduced handling precision and faster wear.
The Hankook Icebear W300 is a polarizing winter tire that receives high praise for its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, often outperforming more expensive all-wheel-drive vehicles. However, user experiences are inconsistent, with some reporting significant issues regarding wet-weather grip, rapid tread wear, and poor performance in slushy or icy conditions.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and mobility in deep and compacted snow
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- High value-to-performance ratio in winter conditions
- Comfortable ride quality and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Weak performance in wet and slushy conditions
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in warmer temperatures
- Limited dry-weather feedback and handling precision
- Potential for sidewall cracking over extended use
Observations
- Rear-wheel-drive vehicles, particularly BMW models, report a transformative improvement in winter capability when equipped with these tires.
- Lightweight, lower-powered vehicles appear to benefit more from the tire's compound characteristics than heavier or high-torque vehicles.
- Users with wider tire sections (e.g., 255mm) noted a higher susceptibility to hydroplaning in wet conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental AllSeasonContact | B · Hankook Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Continental
70
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 86 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 85 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 82 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 76 vs 71 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact
Tire B · Hankook Icebear W300
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental AllSeasonContact also compared with
Hankook Icebear W300 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.