75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
54 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Falken SN828 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
60
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
SN828 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 54 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 54 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 46 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Falken SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 60 |
| Dry | 79 | 81 |
| Wet | 66 | 54 |
| Comfort | 89 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 54 |
| Handling | 71 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
60
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ComfortContact CC6 is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for noise reduction and ride comfort, effectively absorbing road imperfections and providing a serene cabin experience. While it excels in daily commuting and long-distance cruising, it is frequently criticized for its soft sidewalls and lackluster wet-weather performance, making it unsuitable for aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
- Reliable dry-road handling for standard commuting
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
- Lack of steering feedback and stability at higher speeds
Observations
- Users with vehicles lacking factory soundproofing, such as older compact cars, report the most significant improvements in cabin quietness.
- Drivers of taller vehicles or MPVs note that the soft sidewall leads to a lack of confidence during cornering due to increased body roll.
- Performance is highly dependent on driving style; those transitioning from performance-oriented tires often find the CC6's handling characteristics too 'mushy' or unresponsive.
The Falken SN828 is a polarizing budget-oriented tire that receives highly inconsistent feedback regarding its wet-weather performance and noise levels. While some users praise its value, dry grip, and comfort, others report significant safety concerns during rain and disappointing tread longevity.
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry weather traction
- Comfortable ride quality
- Useful integrated tire wear indicators
Cons
- Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
- Subpar tread life and durability
- Unpredictable handling in damp conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daihatsu Cuore reported significant traction loss in wet conditions.
- Owners of compact hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla noted higher-than-expected road noise levels at moderate highway speeds.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Falken SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
60
/ 100
Falken
Winner: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 77 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 89 vs 76 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 66 vs 54 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Falken SN828
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ComfortContact CC6 also compared with
Falken SN828 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.