73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Avon ZZR vs Continental ContiSport Attack — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better comfort, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ZZR | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ZZR | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 74 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | ZZR | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ZZR | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 74 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ZZR | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon ZZR | Continental ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 82 |
| Dry | 89 | 94 |
| Wet | 61 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 74 |
| Handling | 86 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon ZZR is a specialized track-focused tire that delivers exceptional dry-weather grip and performance, particularly for lightweight sports cars like the Caterham and Lotus Elise. While highly regarded for track use, users consistently warn that its wet-weather capabilities are severely limited, making it unsuitable for year-round road driving or inclement conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and traction
- Strong performance consistency during consecutive track laps
- Lightweight construction ideal for track-oriented vehicles
- Good longevity and wear characteristics when used appropriately
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance and high risk of aquaplaning
- Sensitive to low temperatures
- Thin sidewalls provide minimal rim protection
- Prone to flat-spotting if left stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Highly praised by owners of lightweight, track-focused vehicles like the Caterham 7 and Lotus Exige.
- Users noted that tire pressure management is critical for optimal performance, with some reporting significant handling improvements at higher PSI settings.
- Performance on heavier road cars is mixed, with reports of uneven wear and less predictable breakaway characteristics compared to dedicated track platforms.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon ZZR | B · Continental ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Avon
82
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better comfort, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 86 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 74 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 89 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 91 vs 86 on handling.
Tire A · Avon ZZR
Tire B · Continental ContiSport Attack
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon ZZR also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.